Editorial standards
How this publication separates evidence from interpretation
Amathia Polis operates under strict criteria that keep verifiable facts apart from hypothesis. Every claim is tagged by the weight of its support before it is published.
Methodology
Evidentiary standards for submissions and analyses
Each submission is read against the primary record before any interpretive argument is considered. Documented sources, such as archival documents, official publications, and dated maps, are cited in full. Where a source is secondary or undated, the article says so in its opening note. When a link between Amathia and a city, country, or policy is proposed, the piece identifies what the record directly shows and what the author infers from it. The welcome of historical citations, corrections, and archival queries is part of this process, and revisions are noted publicly.
Speculation is never presented as settled fact. Where the record is thin, the piece states the limit of what can be supported and leaves the open question visible for readers and correspondents to test.
Editorial desk
Corrections, citations, and archival queries
Automated contact pathways connect correspondents directly with the editorial staff. Please include the source or article in question so the desk can respond precisely.